The Epstein Files — Andy Harris: Public Record — What He Says and How He Votes

What Harris says publicly

Andy Harris frequently presents himself as a defender of law and order, family values, and the rule of law. In speeches and issue statements, he emphasizes:

Protecting children
Upholding justice
Demanding accountability from powerful institutions
Condemning sexual exploitation and abuse

His rhetoric consistently frames him as someone who believes no one is above the law and that government must act transparently when serious crimes are involved.

Voting record

Where Harris has supported government transparency

✓

Supported declassification of government records on principle

Harris has made general public statements supporting government transparency and declassification. These are stated positions; no specific declassification legislation sponsored by Harris is on record. (Source: Congress.gov — Harris sponsored legislation)

✓

Backed oversight of federal agencies through Appropriations Committee work

As a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee, Harris participates in oversight of federal agencies through the appropriations process. Committee membership is verifiable through Congress.gov. (Source: Congress.gov — Harris committees)

✓

Supported audit and accountability measures for federal spending

Harris has voted for legislation requiring greater accountability in federal spending, including budget resolutions that included audit provisions. His voting record is documented through GovTrack. (Source: GovTrack — Harris votes)

Where Harris has opposed transparency and accountability

✗

Voted against the January 6th Commission — a transparency mechanism

Harris voted against establishing an independent, bipartisan commission to investigate the January 6 attack — a transparency process that proponents argued was essential to public accountability and preventing future threats to democratic institutions. (Source: GovTrack — Harris votes)

✗

Took no public action on Epstein records as they remained sealed

Harris made no public statements or introduced no legislation pressing for the release of Epstein grand jury materials or client lists while they remained under seal — despite holding a position on the Appropriations Committee with oversight of relevant federal agencies. (Source: Congress.gov — Harris)

✗

Opposed oversight of executive branch surveillance programs

Harris voted against amendments that would have imposed greater transparency requirements on executive branch surveillance programs under FISA — limiting Congress's ability to conduct meaningful oversight of intelligence activities. (Source: GovTrack — Harris votes)

Why it matters

Justice delayed is justice denied

Epstein’s victims were failed repeatedly — by prosecutors, institutions, and powerful allies. Lawmakers have a responsibility to confront those failures openly. Silence protects systems, not survivors.

Accountability for the powerful

Epstein’s case is not just about one man — it’s about how wealth and influence shield abusers. Elected officials who claim to champion the rule of law are expected to challenge that corruption, not ignore it.

Public trust in government

When members of Congress refuse to engage with one of the most documented institutional failures in modern criminal justice, it erodes trust — especially among survivors of abuse who already fear being dismissed or ignored.

The Epstein Files and Andy Harris